Affiliate marketing for
financial products just got harder
Social media influencers are trusted by Millennial and
Gen Z followers. They discuss personal finance and often
promote financial products. If so, they are engaging in
affiliate marketing and are called ‘finfluencers’.
The business model many use is to recommend shares or
EFTs (Exchange Traded Funds); and/or to provide affiliate
links to stockbrokers and fund managers, who pay them a
commission for each referral.
The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (“ASIC”)
regulates financial products for the protection of the
public. ASIC has put finfluencers on notice that they
must comply with the law when recommending or giving
opinions upon investing in financial products on social
media. For ASIC, complying with the law means holding a
financial services licence and making sure no misleading
information is provided.
They have focused on finfluencers because they are
trusted.
According to ASIC Media Release 22-054MR (21 March 2022):
“In 2021, the ASIC young people and money survey
found that 33% of 18-21 year olds follow at least one
financial influencer on social media. The survey found a
further 64% of young people reported changing at least
one of their financial behaviours as a result of
following a financial influencer.”
ASIC has issued Information Sheet 269 (INFO 269) which
contains guidance for social media influencers when
discussing financial products and services online or
promoting affiliate links.
This article contains a summary of the Information Sheet,
ASIC’s advice and examples. It is followed by marketing
commentary from a marketing consultant, Michael Field.
Issue #1 What is financial
product advice?
Financial product advice is a recommendation or a
statement of opinion to influence a person to purchase,
hold or sell a financial product such as shares or an
investment fund. It is not sharing factual information –
financial education.
Examples of a recommendation and an opinion:
“I’m going to share with you five long-term stocks
that will do well and which you should buy and hold.” [a
recommendation]
“ETFs will make you a guaranteed positive return.”
[an opinion]
Examples of factual information:
“You can invest by buying shares – this means you are
investing in a company ...
On the other hand, ETFs can track different asset
classes … but the ETF provider owns the shares or assets
on behalf of the fund members.” [educational
information]
“You can save money each week by preparing your own
home-cooked lunches for work, instead of eating out.” [a
tip]
Issue #2 Is it a financial
service?
A financial service is arranging for someone to buy or
sell a financial product. Affiliate marketing links, i.e.
sharing a hyperlink for followers to access a platform to
trade or transact for investments is a form of financial
service called ‘dealing by arranging’. Unlike health
influencers, who can provide affiliate links if they
disclose that the link is sponsored, finfluencers are
not protected by disclosing that the affiliate link is
sponsored.
Example and advice on dealing by arranging:
“You promote a link for your followers to access an
AFS Licensee’s trading platform to trade financial
products. It’s a unique link that can’t be accessed
anywhere else.
You receive a payment from the licensee for each
click-through resulting in use of the platform.
People that access the link also receive a benefit when
buying the products because of your unique link.” [the
active involvement in the transaction makes it dealing
by arranging]
Example of no dealing by arranging:
“You provide the names and details of Australian
Financial Services (“AFS”) licensees that have a
platform to trade financial products.” [simply providing
the names and details of a third-party platform or
financial firm, without being involved in the
transaction is not a breach of the law]
Issue #3 Is it misleading
advice?
Is the overall impression given by the statements of
advice misleading or deceptive? Predictions about future
return or level of risk must be made on reasonable grounds
(substantiated). Otherwise, predictions may be misleading.
Examples of misleading statements:
“Holding onto this share in the long term will
generate significant returns and is just like depositing
your money with a bank!” [‘significant returns’ is
unsubstantiated, ‘like a bank’ gives a misleading
impression of safety]
“Trading in this derivative is a risk-free way to
make a quick profit on the side – I made $$$$ from
trading these alone.” [‘risk free’ is unsubstantiated,
the $$$$ must be true]
Example of a non-misleading statement:
“ETFs offer good diversification across different
asset classes, though there are still risks that the
market or sector that the ETF tracks will fall in
value.”
ASIC’s advice and general
comments
Finfluencers need to avoid giving financial
product advice when posting content about investing on
social media, unless they hold an Australian Financial
Services Licence (AFSL) or they are an authorised
representative of a licensee (i.e. are properly trained and
monitored) or are exempt because they are media commentators
or (in some cases) provide a “not financial advice”
disclosure.
Holding an AFSL will provide protection in relation to
Issues #1 & #2, but not in relation to Issue #3. An AFSL
will not protect against giving misleading advice.
If the finfluencer is being paid a commission or
sponsorship, they may need to disclose that the post is
sponsored content.
Not only must the finfluencer comply with the law,
but the financial product provider must ensure that the
finfluencer complies with the law. In particular, to
make sure that they are not providing unlicensed financial
services. And if the financial product has design and
distribution obligations, it can only be promoted to
consumers in the target market.
ASIC’s approach is to warn finfluencers of the
law.
ASIC Commissioner Cathie Armour warns: ‘ASIC monitors
select online financial discussion by influencers who
feature or promote financial products for misleading or
deceptive representations or unlicensed advice or dealing.
If we see harm occurring, we will take action to enforce the
law.’
The ‘action to enforce the law’ is a reference to ‘the
Corporations Act which imposes significant penalties,
including up to five years' imprisonment for an individual
and financial penalties into the millions of dollars for a
corporation’.
|